1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1966 Jaguar MK II

To start off, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1966 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 Jaguar MK II.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Jaguar MK II.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Chevrolet Camaro 1966 Jaguar MK II
Make Chevrolet Jaguar
Model Camaro MK II
Year Released 1967 1966
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4958 cc 2483 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 290 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 393 Nm 195 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.7 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.3 mm 76.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 8.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 5000 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1600 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2900 mm