1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1977 Mazda 323
To start off, 1977 Mazda 323 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1977 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | 323 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 1414 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2320 mm |