1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1983 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 1983 Daihatsu Taft is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1983 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1983 Daihatsu Taft.
Because 1983 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1983 Daihatsu Taft | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daihatsu |
Model | Camaro | Taft |
Year Released | 1967 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2030 mm |