1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1984 Nissan Micra
To start off, 1984 Nissan Micra is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1984 Nissan Micra. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1984 Nissan Micra.
Because 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Nissan Micra. (74 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1984 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Camaro | Micra |
Year Released | 1967 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2310 mm |