1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1988 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 1988 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (276 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1988 Mitsubishi Minica. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1988 Mitsubishi Minica.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (481 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Mitsubishi Minica. (40 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1988 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | Minica |
Year Released | 1967 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 481 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2270 mm |