1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1990 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1990 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP) has 228 more horse power than 1990 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1990 Skoda Rapid R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm @ 2850 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1990 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | Camaro | Rapid R |
Year Released | 1967 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 393 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2850 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.3 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2410 mm |