1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1991 Tata Estate
To start off, 1991 Tata Estate is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (276 HP) has 209 more horse power than 1991 Tata Estate. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1991 Tata Estate. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Tata Estate weights approximately 325 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (481 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Tata Estate. (118 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Tata Estate.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1991 Tata Estate | |
Make | Chevrolet | Tata |
Model | Camaro | Estate |
Year Released | 1967 | 1991 |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 1947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2830 mm |