1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1993 Mazda 626
To start off, 1993 Mazda 626 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (110 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 626. (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1993 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Camaro | 626 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1993 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4958 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 168 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.3 mm | 98 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2620 mm |
