1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1994 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1994 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1994 Daewoo Arcadia.
Because 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1994 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Daewoo |
| Model | Camaro | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4958 cc | 3205 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4960 mm |
