1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | RX-01 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5749 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2350 mm |