1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1999 Lincoln LS
To start off, 1999 Lincoln LS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1999 Lincoln LS. (249 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1999 Lincoln LS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Lincoln LS. (361 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 1999 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
Model | Camaro | LS |
Year Released | 1967 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 3934 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 249 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.3 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2910 mm |