1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2000 Ford Puma

To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Chevrolet Camaro 2000 Ford Puma
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Camaro Puma
Year Released 1967 2000
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5749 cc 1679 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 153 HP
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2450 mm