1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Honda S2000
To start off, 2001 Honda S2000 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2001 Honda S2000. (238 HP @ 8600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2001 Honda S2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Honda S2000. (208 Nm @ 7500 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Honda S2000.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2001 Honda S2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Camaro | S2000 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 8600 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 208 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 86.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.3 mm | 83.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2370 mm |