1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Kia Sportage
To start off, 2002 Kia Sportage is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2002 Kia Sportage. (126 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Sportage.
Because 2002 Kia Sportage is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Sportage will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Sportage. (175 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Sportage.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Kia Sportage | |
Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
Model | Camaro | Sportage |
Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.3 mm | 86.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2660 mm |