1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | Minica |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2350 mm |