1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Subaru G3X
To start off, 2004 Subaru G3X is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 2004 Subaru G3X. (93 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2004 Subaru G3X.
Because 2004 Subaru G3X is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru G3X will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Subaru G3X. (133 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Subaru G3X.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Subaru G3X | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Camaro | G3X |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.3 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2530 mm |