1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
| Model | Camaro | K2700 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 4958 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4150 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 94.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.3 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2380 mm |
