1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2006 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Bluebird. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Bluebird. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Camaro | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.3 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |