1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Saab 9-7X
To start off, 2006 Saab 9-7X is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 290 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 2006 Saab 9-7X is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Saab 9-7X will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Saab 9-7X. (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Saab 9-7X.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Saab 9-7X | |
Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
Model | Camaro | 9-7X |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 4195 cc |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 376 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.3 mm | 101.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2880 mm |