1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Tata Sumo
To start off, 2006 Tata Sumo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP) has 223 more horse power than 2006 Tata Sumo. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Tata Sumo.
Because 2006 Tata Sumo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Tata Sumo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Tata Sumo. (119 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Tata Sumo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Tata Sumo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Tata |
Model | Camaro | Sumo |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 393 Nm | 119 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2410 mm |