1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2008 Mazda CX-9. (270 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda CX-9. (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 3725 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2880 mm |