1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Ford E-250
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2009 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford E-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2009 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | E-250 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3510 mm |