1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (276 HP) has 156 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Because 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (481 Nm) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Camaro | Cube |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 82 L |