1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | E-350 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2619 mm |