1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2011 Fiat Siena is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,958 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Fiat Siena. (135 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2011 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | Siena |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4958 cc | 1697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 393 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 20.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2380 mm |