1967 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (290 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2013 Lotus Evora. (276 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (393 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Lotus Evora. (350 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Camaro | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Camaro | Evora |
Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.7 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.3 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2575 mm |