1967 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1967 Chevrolet Caprice is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 6,474 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP) has 224 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 700 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Caprice | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Caprice | FX |
Year Released | 1967 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6474 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2620 mm |