1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 1998 Toyota Caldina
To start off, 1998 Toyota Caldina is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1998 Toyota Caldina. (133 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 1998 Toyota Caldina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle weights approximately 238 kg more than 1998 Toyota Caldina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Toyota Caldina is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Caldina will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Toyota Caldina. (181 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Toyota Caldina.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 1998 Toyota Caldina | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Chevelle | Caldina |
Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6478 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 375 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 563 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |