1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle weights approximately 26 kg more than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Because 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Sable. (248 Nm). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
| Model | Chevelle | Sable |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6478 cc | 3001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 375 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 563 Nm | 248 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1574 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1860 mm |
