1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2002 Infiniti FX
To start off, 2002 Infiniti FX is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2002 Infiniti FX. (280 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 2002 Infiniti FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Infiniti FX weights approximately 236 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Infiniti FX. (366 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Infiniti FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2002 Infiniti FX | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Infiniti |
| Model | Chevelle | FX |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6478 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 375 HP | 280 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 563 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1836 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1930 mm |
