1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2004 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XJ is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2004 Jaguar XJ. (294 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 2004 Jaguar XJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 110 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jaguar XJ. (411 Nm). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2004 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Chevelle | XJ |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6478 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 375 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 563 Nm | 411 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1870 mm |