1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (252 HP @ 7150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle weights approximately 124 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Chevelle | Clio |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6478 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 375 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Torque | 563 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.4:1 |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 245 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1840 mm |