1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2005 Morgan Aero 8
To start off, 2005 Morgan Aero 8 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2005 Morgan Aero 8. (321 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 2005 Morgan Aero 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle weights approximately 468 kg more than 2005 Morgan Aero 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Morgan Aero 8. (447 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Morgan Aero 8.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2005 Morgan Aero 8 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Morgan |
Model | Chevelle | Aero 8 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6478 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 375 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 563 Nm | 447 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1132 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |