1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2008 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen C-Crosser weights approximately 225 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Because 2008 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2008 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
| Model | Chevelle | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6478 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 375 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 563 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 16.6:1 |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1825 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
