1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2009 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Sebring. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 30 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Because 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 397 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Sebring. (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2009 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Chevelle | Sebring |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6478 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 375 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 563 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |