1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2009 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Charger. (368 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 360 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Because 2009 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Charger. (536 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2009 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
Model | Chevelle | Charger |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6478 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 375 HP | 368 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 563 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1900 mm |