1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 455 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
| Model | Chevelle | Range Rover Sport |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 375 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 194 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 2055 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
