1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2009 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2009 Mercury Mariner is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2009 Mercury Mariner. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercury Mariner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 325 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Because 2009 Mercury Mariner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Mariner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercury Mariner. (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercury Mariner.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2009 Mercury Mariner | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
| Model | Chevelle | Mariner |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6478 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 375 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 563 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1925 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
