1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2009 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2009 Mercury Milan is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 2009 Mercury Milan. (158 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercury Milan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Milan weights approximately 325 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Because 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Milan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 407 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercury Milan. (156 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercury Milan.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2009 Mercury Milan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Chevelle | Milan |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6478 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 375 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 563 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1925 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1840 mm |