1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (525 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi R8 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi R8. (530 Nm @ 6500 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi R8.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
Model | Chevelle | R8 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6478 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 375 HP | 525 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 563 Nm | 530 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1930 mm |