1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (266 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 305 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
| Model | Chevelle | CTS |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6478 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 375 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 563 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.7 |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1905 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1842 mm |
