1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (314 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 353 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
| Model | Chevelle | CTS |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6478 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 375 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 563 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.3 |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1953 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1842 mm |
