1967 Chevrolet Chevelle vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 151 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. (563 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Chevelle | Camaro |
Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6478 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 375 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 563 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.7 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1751 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1918 mm |