1967 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 6,490 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Impala | 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Pininfarina |
Model | Impala | Metrocubo |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6490 cc | 505 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |