1967 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 6,490 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Impala (325 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2011 Holden Calais. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Calais.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Impala (556 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 1967 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Chevrolet Impala | 2011 Holden Calais | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Impala | Calais |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6490 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 556 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |