1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 1965 Holden FB Special
To start off, 1967 Citroen 2CV is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden FB Special is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Holden FB Special (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Holden FB Special should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Holden FB Special weights approximately 540 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Holden FB Special is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Holden FB Special. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen 2CV | 1965 Holden FB Special | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | 2CV | FB Special |
Year Released | 1967 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |