1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 1981 Volvo 240 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,314 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Volvo 240 (111 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Volvo 240 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen 2CV | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | 240 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2314 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |