1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 1983 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1983 Renault Rodeo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Renault Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Renault Rodeo (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Renault Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Renault Rodeo weights approximately 160 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen 2CV | 1983 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | 2CV | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1967 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 34 L |