1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 (408 HP) has 390 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 weights approximately 845 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Citroen 2CV | 1996 Mercedes-Benz F200 | |
Make | Citroen | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 2CV | F200 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 5987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 408 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1405 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |