1967 Citroen 2CV vs. 1996 Volvo V70
To start off, 1996 Volvo V70 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,383 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo V70 (193 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo V70 weights approximately 844 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Citroen 2CV | 1996 Volvo V70 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | 2CV | V70 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2383 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 193 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1404 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 70 L |
